Publication Ethic

Positive Journal of Law is a peer-reviewed electronic national journal. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal, including the author, editor-in-chief, editorial board, peer-reviewers, and publisher (Raudhah Publisher). This statement is based on the COPE Best Practices Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Publishing Ethics Guidelines

Publishing articles in the Positive Journal of Law is a very important process in developing coherent science and noble morals. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the author's work and the research supporting institutions. The articles reviewed contain and support scientific methodology. Therefore, it is important to agree on standards of ethical behavior that are expected for all parties involved in the publishing process including authors, editors, expert editors, managing editors, publishers, and the public.

Publishing Decisions

Editors are responsible for deciding which submitted articles should be published. The validation of these works and their importance to authors and readers should support this decision. Editors are guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and are constrained by laws covering defamation, copyright, and plagiarism. Editors can discuss with other editors or the assessment team to decide on policies.

Justice

Editors always judge texts based on their intellectuality regardless of the author's race, gender, creed, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality

Expert editors and managing editors are prohibited from disclosing any information regarding submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the authors themselves, senior editors, review partners, and publishers.

Notices and Conflicts of Interest

All unpublished content written in the manuscript is prohibited for use in the editor's own research without confirmation from the author.

Contribute to Editor's Decision

Expert Editor Ratings help editors make editorial decisions and through communication between editorials and authors, this can help authors to improve their articles.